Implementing Performance Accountability in Florida: What Changed, What Mattered and What Resulted?
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Author
Berry, Frances S., Ralph S. Brower and Geraldo Flowers.
Year
2000
Publisher
Public Productivity and Management Review 23, no.3 (2000): 338-358.
Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Link to review:
http://www.jstor.org/view/10448039/ap060042/06a00080/0
Number of pages:
41
Language of publication:
Engelsk
Country of publication:
USA
NSD-reference:
2288
This page was last updated:
2007-07-09 09:30:03.0
- Primærdata
- Kvalitativ
- Intervju
- Dokumentstudie
- Case studie
- USA
- 1.4 Finansiering
- 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
- 3.1 Forvaltningsrevisjon og interne evalueringar
- Forskning
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Finansielle og fiskale formål K
- Rettsvesen K
- Barn og familie I
Summary
How has the performance accountability initiative in Florida changed management and budgeting, and what factors have affected its implementation? This article examines three state agencies--the Department of Revenue, the Department of Children and Families, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement--to understand how their leadership integrated and implemented program performance-based budgeting into their strategic efforts to create comprehensive performance accountability systems. The case studies are organized around four key issues: (a) defining agency structure and decision making, (b) integrating other management initiatives with performance-based budgeting, (c) constituent and stakeholder involvement, and (d) relationships with political principals. Conclusions reveal incremental yet substantive changes that reflect integration of management and budgeting.
Note
Department of Revenue, the Department of Children and Families, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement in Florida.