Jones, L. R. & Kettl, Donald F (2003):
Assessing Public Management Reform in an International Context.
International Public Management Review 1/2003, S. 1 ff.
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Link to publication:
Number of pages:
19
Language of publication:
Engelsk
NSD-reference:
2569
This page was last updated:
24/8 2007
Publikasjonens datagrunnlag:
- Komparativ mellom land
Land som er gjenstand for studien:
- Australia
- New Zealand
- OECD generelt
- Andre land
Studieoppdrag:
- Forskning
Studietype:
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
Type effekt:
- Samfunnseffektivitet
Sektor (cofog):
- Staten generelt
Summary:
Attempts to understand the global public management reform movement suggest two
general implications for research. First, there is a glaring need to understand the shortand
long-term outcomes of the reforms where they have been implemented. Second,
despite the importance of conducting this research, doing so is almost impossible in the
short term and exceedingly difficult in the long term. It is hard enough simply to keep
pace with management changes in each nation. It is even harder to make sound multicountry
comparisons. Efforts to solve this problem sometimes have led researchers to
use a particular nation’s reforms -- often New Zealand’s --as a benchmark, but the
particular problems facing each nation weaken the value of such comparisons. The
paucity of “results about reforms” -- and the need to assess whether management
reforms have helped each nation solve its particular problems -- should motivate
researchers to press ahead.