The New Public Management and a New Accountability
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Author
Barberis, Peter
Year
1998
Publisher
Public Administration, 76 (Fall): 451-470.
Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Link to publication:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/action/showPdf?submitPDF=Full+Text+PDF+%28211+KB%29&doi=10.1111%2F1467-9299.00111&cookieSet=1
Link to review:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9299.00111
Number of pages:
19
Language of publication:
Engelsk
Country of publication:
UK
NSD-reference:
2651
This page was last updated:
2007-09-11 15:06:21.983
- Stat
- Case studie
- Storbritannia
- 1.2 Endring i tilknytningsform
- 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
- Forskning
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Fengselsvesen K
- Barn og familie I
- Staten generelt
Summary
There has long been a disparity between the practice and the neo-Diceyan doctrine of accountability in British central government. This article shows that the New Public Management (NPM), while not itself the root cause of such disparity, has nevertheless both exacerbated and further exposed existing fault-lines. This much is evident from an examination of NPM's theoretical bearings and from brief case studies of the Child Protection Agency and the Prison Service. Reflecting broad and deep-seated forces, the NPM is unlikely to disappear. Thus although there are certain attractions in retaining neo-Diceyan assumptions, it may be more appropriate to reconstruct the formal doctrine. Drawing upon Spiro's notion of 'multicentric' accountability and within the context of calls for wider constitutional reform, the article sketches the basis for a new doctrine, having regard to relevant moralities and practicalities.