Administrative reform - Changing Leadership Roles?
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Author
Christensen, Tom
Year
2001
Publisher
Governance, 14 (4): 457–480. Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Link to publication:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/action/showPdf?submitPDF=Full+Text+PDF+%28123+KB%29&doi=10.1111%2F0952-1895.00169
Number of pages:
24
Language of publication:
Engelsk
Country of publication:
USA
NSD-reference:
2664
This page was last updated:
2007-09-12 12:02:33.763
- Stat
- Case studie
- Komparativ mellom land
- New Zealand
- Norge
- 1.1 Organisering generelt
- 1.2 Endring i tilknytningsform
- Forskning
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
- Samfunnseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Verdimessige effektar
- Staten generelt
Summary
Three interwoven change elements characterize New Public Management: substantial horizontal and vertical specialization, substituting an integrated sector model for a fragmented functional model, and extensive use of contracts as part of a "make the manager manage" kind of incentive system. This article discusses the effects and implications of these reform elements on political-democratic processes in general, and on political, administrative, and public enterprise leadership roles more specifically. Examples from Norway and New Zealand illustrate the discussion.