The State Administration Database

Jantz, Bastian ; Jann, Werner ; Lægreid, Per ; Mattei, Paola (2013):

Mapping accountability changes in labour market administrations: from concentrated to shared accountability?

International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2013, Vol.79(2), pp.227-248

Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.

Type of publication:

Tidsskriftsartikkel

Link to publication:

http://ras.sagepub.com/content/79/2/227.full.pdf

Link to review:

http://ras.sagepub.com/content/79/2/227

ISSN:

0020-8523

Language of publication:

Engelsk

Country of publication:

Norge, Danmark, Tyskland

NSD-reference:

3037

This page was last updated:

16/5 2014

State units related to this publication:

Summary:

The article explores how recent changes in the governance of employment services in three European countries (Denmark, Germany and Norway) have influenced accountability relationships. The overall assumption in the growing literature about accountability is that the number of actors involved in accountability arrangements is rising, that accountability relationships are becoming more numerous and complex, and that these changes may lead to contradictory accountability relationships, and finally to ‘multi accountability disorder’. The article tries to explore these assumptions by analysing the different actors involved and the information requested in the new governance arrangements in all three countries. It concludes that the considerable changes in organizational arrangements and more managerial information demanded and provided have led to more shared forms of accountability. Nevertheless, a clear development towards less political or administrative accountability could not be observed.

Points for practitioners

Public organizations in many areas are confronted with and are using ever more and more sophisticated accountability measures to monitor and improve their performance. But many citizens still perceive them as being not accountable enough. These accountability problems are normally treated by recommending and establishing new and more accountability structures with more actors and information requirements and the assumption that these systems will lead to better output and outcome. At the same time there is a widespread fear that these new shared and fragmented accountability structures weaken established political accountability and legitimacy. The article explores these developments by comparing changes in accountability in labour market administration in three countries and finds that there is more shared accountability but at the same time no weakening of political and administrative accountability.