Reichborn-Kjennerud, Kristin (2013):
Political accountability and performance audit: the case of the auditor general in Norway
John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Public Administration 91 (3) p. 680 -695
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Link to publication:
https://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/9560/Reichborn-Kjennerud_Public%20Administration.pdf
Link to review:
http://hdl.handle.net/1956/9560
Number of pages:
32
Language of publication:
Engelsk
Country of publication:
Norge
NSD-reference:
3108
This page was last updated:
23/4 2015
State units related to this publication:
Summary:
Performance audit is widely used in public administration, but, at present, little empirical evidence exists on its usefulness and contribution to accountability. Based on survey data from 353 civil servants in Norway, this article analyzes the auditees' perceptions of the audit. Performance audit was seen as useful by a majority of the auditees. If auditees agreed to audit criteria and assessments, were allowed to influence the process, had favourable opinions of the reports, and believed that the State Audit Institution contributed to accountability and improvement, then they regarded it as useful. Reports used for accountability purposes were not perceived as less useful. The auditees' administrative level, the use of the report to further interests, and attention from politicians, the media, and the Parliament impacted on the accountability dimension. These results indicate that performance audit can influence civil servants, but the influence is contingent on how the audited civil servants perceive the performance audit.