The State Administration Database

Valenta, Marko; Thorshaug, Kristin (2011):

Avviste asylsøkere i Norge: Ventemottaksordningen og andre returmotiverende tiltak

UNIVERSITETSFORLAGET: TIDSSKRIFT FOR SAMFUNNSFORSKNING

Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.

Type of publication:

Tidsskriftsartikkel

Link to publication:

https://samforsk.brage.unit.no/samforsk-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2612445/Valenta.pdf

Link to review:

http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2612445

Comment:

Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. 2011, 52 (2), 211-234.

Number of pages:

24

ISSN:

1504-291X

Language of publication:

Norsk

Country of publication:

Norge

NSD-reference:

4748

This page was last updated:

7/10 2021

State units related to this publication:

Summary:

REJECTED ASYLUM-SEEKERS IN NORWAY, RETURN CENTRES AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS PROMOTING RETURN
This article focuses on the positioning of rejected asylum-seekers and on perceptions of departure centres and other arrangements promoting return. According to the Norwegian authorities the standard in return centres has to be modest, so that in combination with other return-related measures asylum-seekers should be motivated to return. It is shown in this article that the low standard of living in return centres does not enhance return. Instead, most asylum-seekers avoid these accommodations. For those who have made use of the return centres, life there has contributed primarily to them breaking down. The high level of conflicts eventually culminated in the residents revolting and in the destruction of the centres. It is maintained that rejected asylum-seekers and the Norwegian authorities have conflicting goals and interests that hamper returnrelated work. The conflict lies in the fact that rejected asylum-seekers do not give up the goal of staying in Norway, while the authorities try to return them either voluntarily or by coercion. The asylum-seekers’ positioning toward the departure centres and other arrangements promoting return are analysed in the light of the aforementioned antagonism and the resources that rejected asylum-seekers mobilize in the conflict with the Norwegian authorities.