Peter, B. Guy & Donald J. Savoie (ed.) (1998):
Taking Stock. Assessing Public Sector Reforms.
McGill-Queen`s University Press.
Publikasjonstype:
Bok
Omtale:
http://mqup.mcgill.ca/book.php?bookid=1372
Antall sider:
417
ISSN-nummer:
0-7735-1743-X
Publiseringsspråk:
Engelsk
Land publikasjonen kommer fra:
Canada
NSD-referanse:
2509
Disse opplysningene er sist endret:
16/8 2007
Publikasjonens datagrunnlag:
- Komparativ mellom land
Land som er gjenstand for studien:
- Australia
- Canada
- New Zealand
- Storbritannia
- USA
- EU
Verkemiddel i den konstituerande styringa:
- 1.1 Organisering generelt
- 1.3 Privatisering/markedsretting
- 1.4 Finansiering
- 1.7 Personaladministrative/demografiske verkemiddel
Verkemiddel i den operative styringa av ststlege verksemder:
- 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
Studieoppdrag:
- Forskning
Studietype:
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
Type effekt:
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Samfunnseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Kvalitet og sikkerhetsmessige effektar
- Verdimessige effektar
- Driftskostnadsmessige effektar
- Effekter i arbeidslivet
Sektor (cofog):
- Utøvande og lovgivande myndigheiter K
- Staten generelt
Sammendrag:
In the last two decades governments have invested a great deal of time, money, and political capital in reforms to make the public sector more efficient. They have, however, invested little in evaluating the effectiveness of their efforts, accepting many of the reforms because of a belief in a particular approach to governing or an ideological commitment on the part of politicians. This collection of essays "takes stock" of these reform measures and their impact on public administration.
<p>
Distinguished scholars from six countries investigate the effects of reforms in a number of areas, including budgeting, personnel management, and accountability. While reforms have been beneficial in some of these areas, success has been far from universal. By comparing and contrasting measures in Canada, the United States, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, and Europe, contributors isolate and evaluate factors - such as individual political leaders and the complexity of government - that influence the success or failure of reforms.