Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of OMB’s PART Scores.
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Author
Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis.
Year
2006
Publisher
Public Administration Review 66, no.5 (2006): 742-752.
Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Link to publication:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/action/showPdf?submitPDF=Full+Text+PDF+%28207+KB%29&doi=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6210.2006.00639.x
Link to review:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00639.x
Number of pages:
11
Language of publication:
Engelsk
Country of publication:
USA
NSD-reference:
2294
This page was last updated:
2007-07-09 11:52:06.92
- Sekundærdata
- Kvantitativ
- Dokumentstudie
- Komparativ mellom sektorar
- USA
- 1.4 Finansiering
- 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
- 2.3 Styringssystemer og -verktøy
- 3.1 Forvaltningsrevisjon og interne evalueringar
- Forskning
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Staten generelt
Summary
In this paper, the authors use the Bush administration's management grades from the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) to evaluate performance budgeting in the federal government—in particular, the role of merit and political considerations in formulating recommendations for 234 programs in the president's fiscal year 2004 budget. PART scores and political support were found to influence budget choices in expected ways, and the impact of management scores on budget decisions diminished as the political component was taken into account. The Bush administration's management scores were positively correlated with proposed budgets for programs housed in traditionally Democratic departments but not in other departments. The federal government's most ambitious effort to use performance budgeting to date shows both the promise and the problems of this endeavor.