Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. (2006):
Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of OMB’s PART Scores.
Public Administration Review 66, no.5 (2006): 742-752.
Publikasjonstype:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Fulltekst:
Omtale:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00639.x
Antall sider:
11
Publiseringsspråk:
Engelsk
Land publikasjonen kommer fra:
USA
NSD-referanse:
2294
Disse opplysningene er sist endret:
9/7 2007
Publikasjonens datagrunnlag:
- Sekundærdata
- Kvantitativ
- Dokumentstudie
- Komparativ mellom sektorar
Land som er gjenstand for studien:
- USA
Verkemiddel i den konstituerande styringa:
- 1.4 Finansiering
Verkemiddel i den operative styringa av ststlege verksemder:
- 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
- 2.3 Styringssystemer og -verktøy
Andre verkemiddel i den konstituerande / operative styringa:
- 3.1 Forvaltningsrevisjon og interne evalueringar
Studieoppdrag:
- Forskning
Studietype:
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
Type effekt:
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
Sektor (cofog):
- Staten generelt
Sammendrag:
In this paper, the authors use the Bush administration's management grades from the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) to evaluate performance budgeting in the federal government—in particular, the role of merit and political considerations in formulating recommendations for 234 programs in the president's fiscal year 2004 budget. PART scores and political support were found to influence budget choices in expected ways, and the impact of management scores on budget decisions diminished as the political component was taken into account. The Bush administration's management scores were positively correlated with proposed budgets for programs housed in traditionally Democratic departments but not in other departments. The federal government's most ambitious effort to use performance budgeting to date shows both the promise and the problems of this endeavor.