The State Administration Database

VanLandingham, Gary, Martha Wellman, and Matthew Andrews (2005):

Useful, But Not a Panacea: Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Florida.

International Journal of Public Administration 28, no.3 (2005): 233-253.

Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.

Type of publication:

Tidsskriftsartikkel

Link to publication:

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ftinterface~content=a713731385~fulltext=713240930

Link to review:

http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713731385&db=all

Number of pages:

23

Language of publication:

Engelsk

Country of publication:

USA

NSD-reference:

2316

This page was last updated:

10/7 2007

Publikasjonens datagrunnlag:

Land som er gjenstand for studien:

Verkemiddel i den konstituerande styringa:

Verkemiddel i den operative styringa av ststlege verksemder:

Studieoppdrag:

Studietype:

Type effekt:

Sektor (cofog):

Summary:

Florida's performance-based budgeting reform, called performance-based program budgeting or PB2, followed a defined plan of implementation from its inception in 1995. The reform's implementation was perhaps more interesting for its dynamic adjustments than its planned progression, however. At various points along the reform trajectory key entities charged with driving the reform process had to deal with challenges to both the substance of reform and its day-to-day management. This article presents some of the story of this process. PB2 has not proved a panacea for all the budgeting woes governments like Florida's may face, but it has been useful and the story of its implementation should be of interest.

Note:

State of Florida, USA.