VanLandingham, Gary, Martha Wellman, and Matthew Andrews (2005):
Useful, But Not a Panacea: Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Florida.
International Journal of Public Administration 28, no.3 (2005): 233-253.
Publikasjonstype:
Tidsskriftsartikkel
Fulltekst:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/ftinterface~content=a713731385~fulltext=713240930
Omtale:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713731385&db=all
Antall sider:
23
Publiseringsspråk:
Engelsk
Land publikasjonen kommer fra:
USA
NSD-referanse:
2316
Disse opplysningene er sist endret:
10/7 2007
Publikasjonens datagrunnlag:
- Kvalitativ
- Dokumentstudie
Land som er gjenstand for studien:
- USA
Verkemiddel i den konstituerande styringa:
- 1.4 Finansiering
- 1.5 Lov- og regelverk
Verkemiddel i den operative styringa av ststlege verksemder:
- 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
- 2.3 Styringssystemer og -verktøy
Studieoppdrag:
- Forskning
Studietype:
- Iverksetting/implementeringsstudie
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
Type effekt:
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Samfunnseffektivitet
Sektor (cofog):
- Alminnelig offentlig tjenesteyting
- Staten generelt
Sammendrag:
Florida's performance-based budgeting reform, called performance-based program budgeting or PB2, followed a defined plan of implementation from its inception in 1995. The reform's implementation was perhaps more interesting for its dynamic adjustments than its planned progression, however. At various points along the reform trajectory key entities charged with driving the reform process had to deal with challenges to both the substance of reform and its day-to-day management. This article presents some of the story of this process. PB2 has not proved a panacea for all the budgeting woes governments like Florida's may face, but it has been useful and the story of its implementation should be of interest.
Virksomheter, vertikal og horisontal dimensjon for utenlandske studier:
State of Florida, USA.