Governmental Autonomisation and control: The Norwegian way.

Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.

Author
Christensen, Tom & Per Lægreid

Year
2004

Publisher
Public Administration and Development, Vol 24, Nr. 2 (2004) s.129-135.

Type of publication:
Tidsskriftsartikkel

Link to publication:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/108070590/PDFSTART

Link to review:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/108070590/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

Comment:
Finst også som særtrykk nr 14 (2004) ved Institutt for administrasjon og organisasjonsvitskap.

Number of pages:
7

Language of publication:
Engelsk

NSD-reference:
2518

This page was last updated:
2007-08-20 09:32:19.937


Affiliations related to this publication
  • Regjering
  • Stat
  • Departement
  • Sentraladministrative organ (direktorat m.m.)
  • Forvaltningsorgan med særskilte fullmakter
  • Heleide statsaksjeselskap
  • Særlovsselskap
  • Statsforetak
  • Statsaksjeselskap (deleigd; majoritet)
Publikasjonens datagrunnlag
  • Primærdata
  • Kvalitativ
  • Intervju
Land som er gjenstand for studien
  • Norge
Verkemiddel i den konstituerande styringa
  • 1.1 Organisering generelt
  • 1.2 Endring i tilknytningsform
Verkemiddel i den operative styringa av ststlege verksemder
  • 2.1 Formell styringsdialog
  • 2.2 Kontraktslignande avtaler
Studieoppdrag
  • Forskning
Studietype
  • Iverksetting/implementeringsstudie
  • Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
Type effekt
  • Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
Sektor (cofog)
  • Utøvande og lovgivande myndigheiter K
  • Staten generelt

Summary
This article examines the trade-off between control and autonomy produced in Norway by the autonomisation, agencification
and devolution resulting from a more active administrative reform policy over the past 15 years. It asks what balance exists
between political control and managerial autonomy in practice, how stable it is and how political and administrative leaders
view these issues in the light of their experience. It examines the broad implications of increased autonomisation as experienced
by the administrative and political leadership.