Holkeri, K. & Summa, H. ():
Evaluation of public management reforms in Finland: from ad hoc studies to a programmatic approach
OECD
Please note: This page may contain data in Norwegian that is not translated to English.
Type of publication:
Rapport
Link to publication:
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/9/1902904.pdf
Link to review:
http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_33873108_33873360_1902896_1_1_1_1,00.html
Number of pages:
27
Language of publication:
Engelsk
NSD-reference:
2750
This page was last updated:
21/9 2007
State units related to this publication:
Affiliations related to this publication:
- Stat
- Departement
Publikasjonens datagrunnlag:
- Case studie
Land som er gjenstand for studien:
- Finland
Verkemiddel i den konstituerande styringa:
- 1.1 Organisering generelt
- 1.4 Finansiering
Studieoppdrag:
- Begge deler
Studietype:
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
Type effekt:
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Samfunnseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Verdimessige effektar
Sektor (cofog):
- Finansielle og fiskale formål K
- Staten generelt
Summary:
Governments pursue public management reform policies to achieve certain goals. Such goals usually reflect the wish to improve some aspect of the performance of public bodies or the public sector as a whole. Given the emphasis on performance and result assessment in recent reforms in many member countries, it is natural that the reform programmes themselves should also be evaluated. In the past few years, the Public Management Committee (PUMA) has often stressed in its publications the importance of evaluation to public management reforms. It has pointed out that evaluation is important for the successful implementation and for the sustainability of reforms.