Evaluation of public management reforms in Finland: from ad hoc studies to a programmatic approach
Forfatter
Holkeri, K. & Summa, H.
Utgiver
OECD
Publikasjonstype:
Rapport
Fulltekst:
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/9/1902904.pdf
Omtale:
http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_33873108_33873360_1902896_1_1_1_1,00.html
Antall sider:
27
Publiseringsspråk:
Engelsk
NSD-referanse:
2750
Disse opplysningene er sist endret:
2007-09-21 15:06:22.013
- Stat
- Departement
- Case studie
- Finland
- 1.1 Organisering generelt
- 1.4 Finansiering
- Begge deler
- Effektstudie/implikasjoner/resultater
- Kostnadseffektivitet
- Samfunnseffektivitet
- Strukturelle og styringsmessige effektar
- Verdimessige effektar
- Finansielle og fiskale formål K
- Staten generelt
Sammendrag
Governments pursue public management reform policies to achieve certain goals. Such goals usually reflect the wish to improve some aspect of the performance of public bodies or the public sector as a whole. Given the emphasis on performance and result assessment in recent reforms in many member countries, it is natural that the reform programmes themselves should also be evaluated. In the past few years, the Public Management Committee (PUMA) has often stressed in its publications the importance of evaluation to public management reforms. It has pointed out that evaluation is important for the successful implementation and for the sustainability of reforms.